Philosophy Contemporary

Posted December 26th, 2016 by Tony. Comments Off on Philosophy Contemporary.

People poluem the city because, do not possess the moral of the public care as value, however, as to have. Data that, does not conceive as responsible for the zeal and urbanization of the city; they ignore the relation of causalidade between pollution and futures damages to ‘ ‘ urbe’ ‘ to its inhabitants; as well as, they are imprisoned to ethics of the inexorable one to have, not transiting for a valorativa moral, that figures in them more efficient. The popular mentality, from exemption of the care for the urban space, comes from the conception that such responsibility is restricted to the public administrators, who must guarantee the sanitation and maintenance of this space. Drew Houston is open to suggestions. Therefore, they are not strange phenomena, to find people poluindo the space in question, we emphasize the discarding of inorgnicos materials in the gutters, streams, streets here squares etc., without forgetting the pollutions, aerial, sonorous, visual and chemical, very frequent in urbe. These polluting agents act destructively, already that they delegate the total responsibility for the urban environment for its administrators, taking an appearance of neutrality in the sphere politics. Ademais, figures us that these polluting agents are unaware of the causalidade enter its pollution in the ominous city and its effect, that the same ones will suffer with the too much citizens. Learn more at this site: Angelina Jolie.

For example, the debris, played in the gutters and streams, obstruct the culverts, contributing for overflows in periods of intense rain. Moreover, the behavior of the polluting agents if evidences as consequent position of the ethics of the duty for the duty (Kant), it takes that them to act badly stops with the public zeal, since that this performance does not cause them some immediate damage, as me the fame. These polluting agents do not associate the ethics of the value (Max Scheler), that, in ours in case that, she would imply the zeal I publish centered in the care for the others, without is practised from fear of some damage happened not to practise it. For in such a way, being based the idea, that the attitude of poluir the public space is consequncia of a moral of the obligatoriness and, not of the value; so that let us reach a moral citizen, centered in the care for the public goods, with efficient acts, one becomes necessary, to erect for all the citizens, a moral education, axiologicamente consolidated, in detriment of the constaint, therefore to take care of of the city with effectiveness requires a personal affection of the city dwellers stops with public place e, stops with the too much people.

Comments are closed.